As an English as a Second Language researcher and teacher who has taught in diverse institutions, I know there is much variation in educational approaches, curriculum, and norms for writing genres like academic writing. I also know that how you learned to write and what kinds of educational approaches you experienced probably had a lot to do with where you grew up, and they may influence how you approach the writing process as a Walden student.
The U.S. K-12 school system offers considerable variety in educational approaches and curriculum, yet one characteristic that is seen rather consistently across the system is the approach to writing as a process. This means that writing is often taught as a task that requires planning and that has distinct prewriting, writing, and revising steps. For example, in the younger years of a child’s education, teachers may guide students through the process of brainstorming, outlining, writing a “sloppy copy,” getting some feedback, and then making revisions or edits. Completing one writing assignment may happen over a period of days or weeks.
As students progress through their educational careers, the specific strategies for each step may change, but there is still an emphasis on the prewriting, writing, and revising steps of the process. In high school or college, the writing process may look more like this:
- 1. Read and take notes
- 2. Brainstorm
- 3. Outline
- 4. Read more and take notes
- 5. Write first draft
- 6. Get feedback from faculty or a writing instructor
- 7. Revise
- 8. Read more and add ideas to underdeveloped paragraphs
- 9. Proofread
The approach to writing as a process can be juxtaposed with the approach of writing as a product, meaning that the purpose of the writing is to accomplish a goal or task with the writing in a one-time sitting. The product approach aligns with situations in which grades and assessment may be heavily reliant on high-stakes, essay-style testing (e.g. placement tests, precollege testing, essay-style final exams). In this approach to writing, the goal may be to conform to some type of structure while also communicating as much content as possible in a short period of time. Opportunities for content revisions are less frequent under this approach, but there may be a strong emphasis on how the final product looks at the surface level, including mechanics of writing and the overall form that the writing takes (i.e., standard essay format). While this approach may enable the writer to communicate ideas, it may not leave the time and space for revision and refining that could improve clarity and flow for the reader. The product approach also does not allow time and space for important deep critical thinking and reflection on the topic, which is valued in the process approach.
While both approaches have their places in U.S. academic settings, the process approach tends to be favored and promoted from the early years through higher education and is the ideal approach for most Walden writing assignments because of the greater opportunity for critical thinking and reflection, which can enhance the idea development and overall argument of the paper. Students coming from educational and cultural settings in which the product approach is common may benefit from familiarizing themselves with and practicing some strategies for the prewriting and revision steps, as high quality academic writing is, indeed, a process.
I agree that people with different educational and cultural background have different experience in academic writing, even the thought process can be different in different cultures, I find this myself as I try to translate my first language Slovenian in to my second language English, I use different perspective and approach compare to my American friends. Gia
ReplyDeleteHi Gia! Thanks for your comment, and I’m glad to see that you can relate to what I wrote. It’s great that you can bring your rich perspective to your work and writing at Walden.
Delete-Amy Bakke
I am pursuing a B.S. in Natural Sciences, with a concentration in Biology, as well as, I am finishing up my Post-studies for my certification in, Clinical Research Coordinator. Academic writing, and reports are the most important part of clinical research during a trial. Any findings or information, discovered, must be clean, clear, and to the point. Patients, and future trials, depend on that data to be precise. If any new data of discovery, or research findings, are reported or entered into the database in correctly, all information for that clinical trial is considered voided, and lost. No matter the length of time spent in the trial. Writing process, is a definite, necessary skill in certain job requirements, which require to follow direct instructed information.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your perspective! It is so helpful to hear how writing happens in a variety of disciplines.
DeleteIf anyone else would like to share their experiences writing in their respective fields, please comment below!
I agree with you that writing is a process. What I also know from experience is that everyone's process is slightly different. The process does not always occur in a linear step fashion.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the information, it was informative.
Warmly,
Adrienne
Adrienne,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. And your observation is spot on. When I'm writing, I often move back and forth between stations in the writing process that Amy described above. For example, I have trouble turning off my "internal editor" which means revision and proofreading happen for me all the time, at every stage of the process. This type of recursive process means that the writing process almost can't be linear!
Thanks for sharing and for your continued readership!